SCHD vs SCHG

SCHD and SCHG overlap by 1.2% of their weight, in the 1 company both hold, by the SEC Form N-PORT filings of both for the period ended 2026-05-31.

Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF against Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

View as Markdown What changed
Overlap
1.2%
1 companies in both
barely overlapping
Correlation
0.35
weekly returns, 3 years
barely linked
Cheaper
SCHG
0.04% against 0.06%
Higher, 3 years
SCHG
101.6% against 64.7%
Fell less
SCHD
-12.8% against -21.9%

The short answer

These two hold little or nothing in common, which is unusual for two funds drawn from the same US market: 1 shared companies and 1.2% of weight in common, with weekly returns correlating at 0.35 over three years.

The two funds

SCHD
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Last close, 2026-10-15
$34.10 +1.16%
Cost per year
0.06%
Return, 1 year
31.8%higher
Return, 3 years
64.7%
Worst fall, 3 years
-12.8%shallower
Volatility
12.9%calmer
Positions
99
Top 10 weight
43.6%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Last close, 2026-10-15
$35.93 +0.06%
Cost per year
0.04%cheaper
Return, 1 year
13.0%
Return, 3 years
101.6%higher
Worst fall, 3 years
-21.9%
Volatility
18.9%
Positions
193
Top 10 weight
57.2%

SCHD and SCHG, prices through 2026-10-16. How the badges are decided.

Holdings overlap

1.2%

1 companies sit in both funds. That is 5.1% of SCHD's own weight and 1.2% of SCHG's.

Side by side

Cost per yearlower is better
SCHD0.06%
SCHG0.04%
Return, 1 yearhigher is better
SCHD31.8%
SCHG13%
Return, 3 yearshigher is better
SCHD64.7%
SCHG101.6%
Worst fall, 3 yearsshallower is better
SCHD-12.8%
SCHG-21.9%
Volatilitycalmer is better
SCHD12.9%
SCHG18.9%
Top 10 weight
SCHD43.6%
SCHG57.2%
SCHD against SCHG, each pair of bars on a shared scale, prices through 2026-10-16.
Each bar is one whole fund, cut at the share it holds in common with the other. 1.2% of their weight is held in common, in the 1 companies both own.

What the numbers say

Two screens that are close to mutually exclusive

The intersection between SCHD and SCHG comes to 1 companies, out of 99 and 193 positions, and the weight held in common to 1.2%. For two funds drawn from the same US large-cap universe that is unusual, and it follows from the screens: one selects for dividend quality, the other for growth.

Not one name appears on both top lists

SCHD's largest position that SCHG does not hold is Qualcomm, and SCHG's largest that SCHD does not hold is Nvidia. There is no name in common anywhere near the top of either fund.

A year in which they moved with no relationship at all

The correlation figures show what that means in practice. Over five years their weekly returns correlated at 0.56, over three years at 0.35, and over the past year at -0.07, meaning that for twelve months they have moved with no relationship to each other. Between two large US equity funds, a year of movement that unrelated is rare.

The choice changes what you own

It also cuts both ways. Over the past year SCHD returned 31.8% against 13.0% for SCHG; over three years SCHG returned 101.6% against 64.7%. SCHD fell -12.8% at its worst against -21.9% for SCHG, and carries 12.9% volatility against 18.9%. One fund is income and steadier prices, the other is growth and larger swings, and unlike most fund pairs the two put different companies in an account.

Where they hold the same companies

MeasureValue
Overlap by weight1.2%
Share of SCHD held in common with SCHG5.1%
Share of SCHG held in common with SCHD1.2%
Companies in both1
Positions in SCHD / SCHG99 / 193

SCHD holdings from its SEC Form N-PORT for the period ended 2026-05-31, filed 2026-07-24; SCHG holdings from its SEC Form N-PORT for the period ended 2026-05-31, filed 2026-07-24.

Largest positions held by both

RankCompanyIn SCHDIn SCHGWeight in eachOverlap
1 UNH UnitedHealth Group 5.09% 1.2% 1.2%

Held by only one of them

In SCHD onlyWeightIn SCHG onlyWeight
QCOM Qualcomm6.74% NVDA Nvidia11.01%
TXN Texas Instruments5.9% AAPL Apple9.83%
KO Coca-Cola3.96% MSFT Microsoft7.17%
MRK Merck3.86% AMZN Amazon5.67%
CVX Chevron3.83% GOOGL Alphabet Class A4.75%
VZ Verizon3.65% AVGO Broadcom4.55%
PG Procter & Gamble3.55% TSLA Tesla3.91%
COP ConocoPhillips3.51% GOOG Alphabet Class C3.78%
AMGN Amgen3.47% META Meta Platforms3.45%
PEP PepsiCo3.44% LLY Eli Lilly3.05%

Covariance and correlation

Covariance, annualised (%2)

SCHDSCHG
SCHD16685.6
SCHG85.6357

Percent squared per year, three years of weekly returns

Correlation, 3 years

SCHDSCHG
SCHD1.000.35barely linked
SCHG0.35barely linked1.00

Weekly total returns, what the bands mean

Check it: 85.6 divided by (12.9 × 18.9) is 0.35, the correlation in the second matrix.

One year, side by side

SCHD 131 SCHG 110
2025-10-242026-10-16
Both rebased to 100 a year ago, weekly closes.

Cost, returns and risk

MeasureSCHDSCHG
Expense ratio0.06%0.04%
Dividend yieldn/an/a
Total return, 1 year31.8%13.0%
Total return, 3 years cumulative64.7%101.6%
Total return, 5 years cumulative56.8%87.7%
Volatility, annualised on 3 years of weekly returns12.9%18.9%
Worst fall in 3 years, peak to trough, weekly closes-12.8%-21.9%
Beta against the S&P 5000.511.26
Positions held99193
Weight in the ten largest positions43.6%57.2%
Weight in the single largest position6.7%11.0%
Assetsn/an/a

Prices through 2026-10-16. The positions and the weights of the largest positions are from SCHD's SEC Form N-PORT for the period ended 2026-05-31 and SCHG's SEC Form N-PORT for the period ended 2026-05-31.

Year by year

YearSCHDSCHG
2026 27.4% 10.5%
2025 4.3% 17.5%
2024 11.7% 35.0%
2023 4.5% 50.1%
2022 -3.3% -31.8%

Do they move together

WindowCorrelation of weekly returns
1 year-0.07
3 years0.35
5 years0.56

Where to go next

How these numbers are produced · Ask the same questions from your assistant

Cite this page

TickerInside, SCHD vs SCHG, holdings from SCHD's SEC Form N-PORT for the period ended 2026-05-31, filed 2026-07-24, and SCHG's SEC Form N-PORT for the period ended 2026-05-31, filed 2026-07-24, https://tickerinside.com/compare/schd-vs-schg/, CC BY 4.0

<a href="https://tickerinside.com/compare/schd-vs-schg/">TickerInside</a> (https://tickerinside.com/compare/schd-vs-schg/)