VOO vs VUG
VOO and VUG overlap by 57.5% of their weight, in the 121 companies both hold, by the SEC Form N-PORT filings of both for the period ended 2026-06-30.
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF against Vanguard Growth ETF.
The short answer
VUG is the growth half of the large-cap market, and 97.4% of it sits inside VOO. Which fund returned more depends on the window: VUG over three years, 93.2% against 84.6%, VOO over five, 76.8% against 70.3%.
The two funds
- Last close, 2026-10-28
- $709.90 +0.34%
- Cost per year
- 0.03%
- Return, 1 year
- 14.5%higher
- Return, 3 years
- 84.6%
- Worst fall, 3 years
- -16.7%shallower
- Volatility
- 13.8%calmer
- Positions
- 504
- Top 10 weight
- 36.4%
- Last close, 2026-10-28
- $88.81 +0.41%
- Cost per year
- 0.03%
- Return, 1 year
- 7.3%
- Return, 3 years
- 93.2%higher
- Worst fall, 3 years
- -21.8%
- Volatility
- 19.0%
- Positions
- 146
- Top 10 weight
- 60.4%
VOO and VUG, prices through 2026-10-28. How the badges are decided.
Holdings overlap
121 companies sit in both funds. That is 58.0% of VOO's own weight and 97.4% of VUG's.
Side by side
VOO from its SEC Form N-PORT for the period ended 30 Jun 2026, VUG from its SEC Form N-PORT for the period ended 30 Jun 2026
What the numbers say
Half of VOO, at growth weight
VUG holds 146 companies and VOO 504, and 121 of them are in both. Almost nothing in VUG is missing from VOO, 2.6% of its weight in 25 companies such as Snowflake and Cloudflare. Seen from VOO, 58.0% of the index is in VUG's list and 42.0% is not: JPMorgan, Berkshire Hathaway, Exxon, Johnson & Johnson and Walmart are the largest of the 383 companies the growth screen leaves out.
Nvidia, Apple and Microsoft, counted twice over
The shared companies are not held at the same size. Nvidia, Apple and Microsoft each weigh markedly more in VUG than in VOO, and the ten largest positions take 60.4% of VUG against 36.4% of VOO. That is what the overlap of 57.5% by weight measures: the same names, at index weight on one side and at growth weight on the other.
The window decides the winner
Over three years VUG returned 93.2% and VOO 84.6%. Over five years the order flips, 76.8% for VOO against 70.3% for VUG, and over the past year VOO led again at 14.5% against 7.3%. The concentration shows in the risk figures: VUG's volatility of 19.0% against 13.8%, and a worst fall of -21.8% against -16.7%.
Different portfolios that move together
Weekly returns correlated at 0.95 over three years. A portfolio holding both is VOO with its growth half counted twice; a portfolio holding VUG alone has given up the 383 companies that make up 42.0% of the index.
Where they hold the same companies
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| Overlap by weight | 57.5% |
| Share of VOO held in common with VUG | 58.0% |
| Share of VUG held in common with VOO | 97.4% |
| Companies in both | 121 |
| Positions in VOO / VUG | 504 / 146 |
VOO holdings from its SEC Form N-PORT for the period ended 2026-06-30, filed 2026-08-28; VUG holdings from its SEC Form N-PORT for the period ended 2026-06-30, filed 2026-08-28.
Largest positions held by both
| Rank | Company | In VOO | In VUG | Weight in each | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA Nvidia | 7.51% | 12.63% | 7.51% | |
| 2 | AAPL Apple | 6.59% | 11.67% | 6.59% | |
| 3 | MSFT Microsoft | 4.3% | 7.61% | 4.3% | |
| 4 | AMZN Amazon | 3.62% | 4.47% | 3.62% | |
| 5 | GOOGL Alphabet Class A | 3.25% | 5.76% | 3.25% | |
| 6 | AVGO Broadcom | 2.77% | 4.28% | 2.77% | |
| 7 | GOOG Alphabet Class C | 2.59% | 4.53% | 2.59% | |
| 8 | META Meta Platforms | 1.92% | 3.41% | 1.92% | |
| 9 | TSLA Tesla | 1.84% | 3.27% | 1.84% | |
| 10 | LLY Eli Lilly | 1.47% | 2.81% | 1.47% | |
| 11 | AMD Advanced Micro Devices | 1.47% | 2.62% | 1.47% | |
| 12 | AMAT Applied Materials | 0.89% | 1.6% | 0.89% | |
| 13 | V Visa | 0.87% | 1.54% | 0.87% | |
| 14 | LRCX Lam Research | 0.84% | 1.51% | 0.84% | |
| 15 | INTC Intel | 1.02% | 0.79% | 0.79% |
Held by only one of them
| In VOO only | Weight | In VUG only | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| MU Micron Technology | 2.02% | SPCX Space Exploration Techn | 0.29% |
| BRK.B Berkshire Hathaway | 1.42% | SNOW Snowflake | 0.25% |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase | 1.26% | BE Bloom Energy | 0.24% |
| JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 0.95% | NET Cloudflare | 0.23% |
| XOM ExxonMobil | 0.88% | RKLB Rocket Lab | 0.18% |
| WMT Walmart | 0.77% | WCN Waste Connections | 0.14% |
| CAT Caterpillar | 0.76% | ALNY Alnylam Pharmaceuticals | 0.13% |
| CSCO Cisco | 0.72% | ALAB Astera Labs | 0.12% |
| ABBV AbbVie | 0.69% | CRWV Coreweave Inc | 0.12% |
| UNH UnitedHealth Group | 0.59% | RBLX Roblox | 0.12% |
Covariance and correlation
Covariance, annualised (%2)
| VOO | VUG | |
|---|---|---|
| VOO | 190 | 249.1 |
| VUG | 249.1 | 361 |
Percent squared per year, three years of weekly returns
Correlation, 3 years
| VOO | VUG | |
|---|---|---|
| VOO | 1.00 | 0.95almost always in step |
| VUG | 0.95almost always in step | 1.00 |
Weekly total returns, what the bands mean
Check it: 249.1 divided by (13.8 × 19.0) is 0.95, the correlation in the second matrix.
One year, side by side
Cost, returns and risk
| Measure | VOO | VUG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Dividend yield | 1.06% | 0.38% |
| Total return, 1 year | 14.5% | 7.3% |
| Total return, 3 years cumulative | 84.6% | 93.2% |
| Total return, 5 years cumulative | 76.8% | 70.3% |
| Volatility, annualised on 3 years of weekly returns | 13.8% | 19.0% |
| Worst fall in 3 years, peak to trough, weekly closes | -16.7% | -21.8% |
| Beta against the S&P 500 | 0.99 | 1.3 |
| Positions held | 504 | 146 |
| Weight in the ten largest positions | 36.4% | 60.4% |
| Weight in the single largest position | 7.5% | 12.6% |
| Assets (Vanguard: whole fund, all share classes) | $1.73T | $392.1B |
Prices through 2026-10-28. The positions and the weights of the largest positions are from VOO's SEC Form N-PORT for the period ended 2026-06-30 and VUG's SEC Form N-PORT for the period ended 2026-06-30.
Year by year
| Year | VOO | VUG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 14.2% | 9.6% |
| 2025 | 17.8% | 19.4% |
| 2024 | 25.0% | 32.7% |
| 2023 | 26.3% | 46.8% |
| 2022 | -18.2% | -33.2% |
Do they move together
| Window | Correlation of weekly returns |
|---|---|
| 1 year | 0.95 |
| 3 years | 0.95 |
| 5 years | 0.96 |
Where to go next
- VOO, the full page: every holding, and what else it duplicates
- VUG, the full page
- VT vs VTI
- QQQM vs SCHG
- RSP vs SPY
- Run the x-ray on your whole portfolio, this pair included
- Check any other pair in the overlap calculator
How these numbers are produced · Ask the same questions from your assistant
Cite this page
TickerInside, VOO vs VUG, holdings from VOO's SEC Form N-PORT for the period ended 2026-06-30, filed 2026-08-28, and VUG's SEC Form N-PORT for the period ended 2026-06-30, filed 2026-08-28, https://tickerinside.com/compare/voo-vs-vug/, CC BY 4.0
<a href="https://tickerinside.com/compare/voo-vs-vug/">TickerInside</a> (https://tickerinside.com/compare/voo-vs-vug/)