TickerInside
Connect your agent Copies a setup prompt for your AI assistant

IOO holdings and overlap

View as Markdown What changed
IOOiShares Global 100 ETFGlobal Large-Stock Blend, iShares, 101 positions
Last close, 2026-09-04
$145.04 -0.43%
52-week range 115 to 146
Largest position
13.16% of the fund, NVIDIA
Positions
101
58.9% in the ten largest
Cost per year
0.40%
$40 a year on $10,000
Assets
$9.2B
under management
Return, 3 years
+97.7%
cumulative, total return
Worst fall
-16.8%
peak to trough, 3 years, weekly closes

What does IOO hold, as of its issuer file of 2026-09-03?

IOO holds 101 positions as of the issuer file dated 2026-09-03. The three largest are NVIDIA at 13.16%, Apple at 11.47% and Microsoft at 9.01%; half of the fund sits in its ten largest names.

RankCompanyWeightWeight bar
1 NVDA NVIDIA 13.16%
2 AAPL Apple 11.47%
3 MSFT Microsoft 9.01%
4 AMZN AMAZON.COM Inc 6.03%
5 GOOGL Alphabet 4.78%
6 AVGO Broadcom Inc 4.02%
7 GOOG Alphabet 3.81%
8 JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.3%
9 LLY Eli Lilly 2.18%
10 005930 Samsung Electronics Ltd 2.15%
11 XOM Exxonmobil Holdings Corp 1.6%
12 JNJ Johnson & Johnson 1.59%
13 ASML ASML Holding 1.53%
14 WMT Walmart Inc 1.13%
15 MA Mastercard 1.12%
16 INTC Intel Corporation 1.08%
17 CSCO Cisco Systems Inc 1.02%
18 CVX Chevron 0.94%
19 MRK Merck & Co Inc 0.9%
20 CAT Caterpillar Inc 0.88%
21 HSBA HSBC Holdings PLC 0.87%
22 GE Ge Aerospace 0.83%
23 KO Coca-Cola 0.82%
24 PG Procter & Gamble 0.81%
25 700 Tencent Holdings 0.8%

Issuer file 1 day old on 2026-09-04, against a median of 1 across the funds with a page. Every one of the 101 positions with its weight is in the fund's JSON file. See which other ETFs hold NVDA, and at what weight.

What does IOO duplicate?

The fund nearest to IOO is XLG: the two hold 73.9% of their weight in common, in the 30 companies both own, and 74.6% of IOO itself is also held there. Owning IOO alongside the funds at the top of this table means holding mostly the same companies twice.

FundOverlap by weightOf IOO held thereOf that fund in IOOCompanies in bothOverlap bar
XLG 73.9% 74.6% 74.3% 30
OEF 68.3% 79.1% 68.4% 43
MGC 60.5% 79.9% 60.5% 47
VOOG 56.9% 67.4% 62.9% 23
VUG 56.6% 59.0% 61.5% 14
SPYG 56.5% 67.4% 62.7% 23
IVW 56.5% 67.4% 62.7% 23
USCL 56.3% 79.3% 56.4% 51
MGK 55.8% 57.2% 63.2% 11
IUSG 55.7% 67.9% 59.6% 24
THRO 53.4% 76.4% 62.3% 40
QVML 52.8% 74.1% 53.8% 48

From each issuer's latest file. Check IOO against any fund in the ETF overlap calculator · how overlap is measured.

What adds something different to IOO?

TAN shares 0% of weight with IOO and its weekly returns correlate with it at 0.39 over three years. The table lists the covered funds with the least in common with IOO, least shared weight first and, among equals, lowest correlation.

Cost, returns and risk

Expense ratio0.40%
Dividend yield0.81%
Total return, 1 year26.8%
Total return, 3 years cumulative97.7%
Total return, 5 years cumulative111.5%
Volatility, annualised15.8%
Worst fall, 3 years-16.8%
Beta against SPY, 3 years of weekly returns1.05
Weight in the ten largest positions58.9%
Largest single position13.2%
Assets under management$9.2B

Expense ratio, yield and assets are reference data; every other figure is computed here from weekly closes.

How it moves with the market

AgainstCorrelation, 3 yearsCovariance, annualised, in percent squared
SPY0.96almost always in step219
QQQ0.94usually in step289

Weekly total returns. What the bands mean · why the covariance is printed.

Year by year

YearTotal return
202615.1%
202527.0%
202426.5%
202327.7%
2022-16.3%

One year

IOO 125 SPY 118
2025-09-122026-09-04
IOO rebased to 100 a year ago, weekly closes, prices through 2026-09-04.

Where to go next

Holdings from the issuer file published 2026-09-03. Prices through 2026-09-04. How every figure here is produced. Measurements, not investment advice.