Which ETFs diversify a portfolio of VOO 60% and QQQ 40% the most?

What the answer measures
VOO 60QQQ 40
Up to six ETFs. Add a weight after a colon to every ETF, or to none: VOO:60, or an amount such as VOO:25000, which the address turns into a weight. The answer measures the weekly correlation of the large US ETFs of the list below with them, the lowest first.Name up to six ETFs a side. Add a weight after a colon to every ETF you hold, or to none: QQQ:40, or an amount such as QQQ:25000, which the address turns into a weight. Without weights the ETFs count equally.

Over the 156 weeks to 2026-10-13, among 29 large US ETFs, the bond ETF with the lowest weekly correlation with VOO 60% and QQQ 40% was SHY, at 0.01, the sector stock ETF XLE, at 0.10, and the commodity ETF GLD, at 0.14.

Correlation measures how two ETFs move together: 1 means always together, 0 means no link, below 0 means opposite.

Measurement, not investment advice.

View as Markdown What changed
Connect your agent Copies a setup prompt

What are the top 3 ETFs that diversify the portfolio most?

Out of the 29 large US ETFs of the list, the lowest weekly correlation with the portfolio, one ETF per group so that the 3 are different kinds of exposure, lowest first.

1Bonds

SHY

iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF

0.01weekly correlation with the portfolio

Moved almost independently of the portfolio

  • When the portfolio fell-0.31 correlation over the 63 weeks the portfolio fell: it tended to move the other way
  • With 10% in it14.4% volatility, instead of 16.0% without it

2Sector stocks

XLE

Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund

0.10weekly correlation with the portfolio

Moved almost independently of the portfolio

  • When the portfolio fell0.65 correlation over the 63 weeks the portfolio fell: it moved mostly with it
  • With 10% in it14.8% volatility, instead of 16.0% without it

3Commodities

GLD

SPDR Gold Shares

0.14weekly correlation with the portfolio

Moved almost independently of the portfolio

  • When the portfolio fell0.21 correlation over the 63 weeks the portfolio fell: it moved partly with it
  • With 10% in it14.8% volatility, instead of 16.0% without it

How do the other 26 ETFs of the list compare?

The top 3 take one ETF per group; the others follow from 4, lowest correlation first, each with its weekly correlation with the portfolio and its correlation over the weeks the portfolio fell.

4IEFBonds

iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF

0.04Moved almost independently of the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: -0.34

5TLTBonds

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF

0.07Moved almost independently of the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: -0.32

6BNDBonds

Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF

0.13Moved almost independently of the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: -0.28

7TIPBonds

iShares TIPS Bond ETF

0.15Moved almost independently of the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: -0.13

8XLUSector stocks

Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund

0.16Moved almost independently of the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: 0.15

9XLPSector stocks

Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund

0.23Moved partly with the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: 0.10

Show the other 20

10LQDBonds

iShares iBoxx Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

0.26Moved partly with the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: -0.20

11XLVSector stocks

Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund

0.33Moved partly with the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: 0.21

12IGFSector stocks

iShares Global Infrastructure ETF

0.40Moved partly with the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: 0.28

13VNQSector stocks

Vanguard Real Estate ETF

0.41Moved partly with the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: 0.31

14SCHDUS stocks, lowest of its group

Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF

0.49Moved partly with the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: 0.52

15VNQISector stocks

Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF

0.52Moved mostly with the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: 0.24

16AVUVUS stocks

Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF

0.59Moved mostly with the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: 0.53

17HYGBonds

iShares iBoxx High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

0.63Moved mostly with the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: 0.39

18AVDVInternational stocks, lowest of its group

Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF

0.65Moved mostly with the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: 0.60

19USMVUS stocks

iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF

0.66Moved mostly with the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: 0.53

20VWOEmerging market stocks, lowest of its group

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF

0.71Moved mostly with the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: 0.53

21VTVUS stocks

Vanguard Value ETF

0.71Moved mostly with the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: 0.61

22VEAInternational stocks

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF

0.72Moved mostly with the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: 0.57

23IWMUS stocks

iShares Russell 2000 ETF

0.73Moved mostly with the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: 0.61

24VXUSInternational stocks

Vanguard Total International Stock ETF

0.75Moved mostly with the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: 0.58

25RSPUS stocks

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF

0.77Moved mostly with the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: 0.67

26VOUS stocks

Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF

0.81Moved closely with the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: 0.72

27MTUMUS stocks

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF

0.89Moved closely with the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: 0.81

28QUALUS stocks

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF

0.95Moved closely with the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: 0.86

29VTIUS stocks

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF

0.98Moved closely with the portfolio

When the portfolio fell: 0.95

Weekly returns over the 156 weeks to 2026-10-13; down weeks are the 63 weeks the portfolio's weekly return was below zero. QQQ is in the list and held, so it is left out. Overlap by weight from the issuer files of 2026-08-31 to 2026-10-13.

How did $100 grow in the portfolio, SHY, XLE and GLD?

The same 156 weeks for every line, to 2026-10-13. Where a coloured line moves differently from the black one, that ETF moved differently from the portfolio.

$100 in the portfolio became $201 over the 156 weeks from 2023-10-20 to 2026-10-13; in SHY $112, in XLE $161 and in GLD $208. Each line compounds the weekly returns the correlations are measured on.

How closely did SHY, XLE and GLD follow the portfolio, week by week?

The flatter the cloud, the less the ETF follows the portfolio.

Each dot is one of the 156 weeks to 2026-10-13. Its position across is the weekly return of VOO 60% and QQQ 40%, and its height is the weekly return of the ETF named on the panel.

  • The 63 down weeks, when your ETFs fell (left of the zero line)
  • The other 93 weeks

SHY

Correlation 0.01, on down weeks -0.31

XLE

Correlation 0.10, on down weeks 0.65

GLD

Correlation 0.14, on down weeks 0.21

The panels use the same weeks and weekly returns as the correlations above. In every panel, the scale across runs from -10% to +10% and the scale up from -20% to +20%. The weekly returns come from the fund files of VOO, QQQ, SHY, XLE and GLD.

How much do SHY, XLE and GLD overlap with VOO 60% and QQQ 40%, and how volatile were they?

Overlap: the weight each ETF holds in companies VOO 60% and QQQ 40% also hold, counted at the smaller weight; the lower, the less it repeats what you hold. Volatility: how much the weekly returns varied, annualised.

ETFWeekly correlation156 weeks to 2026-10-13On down weeksthe 63 weeks the portfolio fellOverlapby weight with yoursVolatilityannualised, 156 weeks
SHYiShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETFBonds0.01-0.31Holds bonds1.6%
Overlap by weight
Holds bonds
Volatility
1.6%
XLEEnergy Select Sector SPDR FundSector stocks0.100.652.3%22.9%
Overlap by weight
2.3%
Volatility
22.9%
GLDSPDR Gold SharesCommodities0.140.21Holds gold18.6%
Overlap by weight
Holds gold
Volatility
18.6%
VOO, QQQyour ETFs, at your weights16.0%
Volatility
16.0%
  • With 10% in SHY and 90% in VOO and QQQ at their weights, the portfolio's annualised weekly volatility over the 156 weeks to 2026-10-13 would have been 14.4% instead of 16.0%.
  • With 10% in XLE and 90% in VOO and QQQ at their weights, the portfolio's annualised weekly volatility over the 156 weeks to 2026-10-13 would have been 14.8% instead of 16.0%.
  • With 10% in GLD and 90% in VOO and QQQ at their weights, the portfolio's annualised weekly volatility over the 156 weeks to 2026-10-13 would have been 14.8% instead of 16.0%.

What do SHY, XLE and GLD hold, next to your portfolio?

Each ETF's weight in mega-cap tech, its largest sector or asset and its largest country outside the US, with your portfolio in the last row for comparison.

ETFHoldings fileMega-cap techLargest sector or assetLargest outside the US
SHYiShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETFSEC Form N-PORT, 2026-05-31NoneUS Treasury notes and bonds 99.0%Money market funds 1.8%Not measured
Mega-cap tech
None
Largest sector or asset
US Treasury notes and bonds 99.0%Money market funds 1.8%
Largest outside the US
Not measured
XLEEnergy Select Sector SPDR FundIssuer file, 2026-10-130.0%Energy 99.8%None, 99.8% US
Mega-cap tech
0.0%
Largest sector
Energy 99.8%
Largest outside the US
None, 99.8% US
GLDSPDR Gold SharesTrust's own SEC filing, 2026-06-30NoneGold 100.0%Not measured
Mega-cap tech
None
Largest sector or asset
Gold 100.0%
Largest outside the US
Not measured
Your portfolioVOO 60% and QQQ 40%100% looked through38.2%Technology 46.2%Netherlands 0.5%
Mega-cap tech
38.2%
Largest sector
Technology 46.2%
Largest outside the US
Netherlands 0.5%

Share this answer

A 1200 by 630 PNG of this answer, drawn in your browser.

This answer as JSONThis answer as Markdown.

Questions and answers

Which ETF in each group of the list had the lowest weekly correlation with VOO 60% and QQQ 40%?
SHY 0.01 (bonds), XLE 0.10 (sector stocks), GLD 0.14 (commodities), SCHD 0.49 (US stocks), AVDV 0.65 (international stocks) and VWO 0.71 (emerging market stocks), over the 156 weeks to 2026-10-13, among 29 large US ETFs.
How did SHY, XLE and GLD move on the weeks the portfolio fell?
On the 63 weeks the portfolio fell, of the 156 to 2026-10-13, their weekly correlation with VOO 60% and QQQ 40% was -0.31 for SHY, 0.65 for XLE and 0.21 for GLD.
How would 10% in SHY, XLE or GLD have changed the volatility of VOO 60% and QQQ 40%?
Over the 156 weeks to 2026-10-13, the annualised weekly volatility of VOO 60% and QQQ 40% was 16.0%; with 10% in SHY it would have been 14.4%, in XLE 14.8%, and in GLD 14.8%.
How much of XLE is in companies VOO 60% and QQQ 40% also hold?
100.0% of XLE's weight is in 21 holdings VOO 60% and QQQ 40% also hold (by ticker); counted at the smaller of the two weights, the overlap is 2.3%. XOM, CVX and BKR account for 0.61, 0.35 and 0.15 points of it. XLE holdings of 2026-10-13.

How each figure is measured, and the order of the table: how the numbers are produced.

The 30 ETFs and the rule

From the ETFs of the list, leaving out any ETF the portfolio holds: in each group, the ETF whose weekly returns had the lowest correlation with the portfolio's over the weeks both have, up to 156, compared before rounding; the answer opens on the 3 groups whose lowest is lowest, and an exact tie keeps the order of the list.

US stocks
VTI, RSP, QQQ, VTV, SCHD, VO, IWM, AVUV, USMV, QUAL, MTUM
Sector stocks
XLU, XLP, XLV, XLE, VNQ, VNQI, IGF
International stocks
VXUS, VEA, AVDV
Emerging market stocks
VWO
Bonds
BND, SHY, IEF, TLT, TIP, LQD, HYG
Commodities
GLD

Chosen on 2026-10-10: 30 large US ETFs across six kinds of exposure, one ETF per exposure, the same list for every portfolio. Left out on purpose: S&P 500 ETFs weighted by company size, near duplicates of VTI; sector ETFs for technology, financials, industrials, consumer discretionary, communication services and materials; Treasury bills; single commodities other than gold; gold miners; bitcoin; and leveraged, inverse and volatility products. The list and its weekly returns as one file: candidates.json.